As mentioned earlier, choosing the right business model will check whether SMEs survive or die.
A hybrid business model such as a Virtual Captive can deliver higher value-added services while being low on cost.
The benefits include:
*Optional property ownership
*Less on capital investment and more on process flexibility
*Quick implementation speed
*Enlarged business strategy and focus
*Quick adaptation based on business requirements
*Transparent cost structure
*Total operational control
A Virtual captive can be considered advantageous due to smaller financial risk at the initial investment and local presence and experience of the provider can decrease the set up and operational risks.
The model provides an opportunity for SMEs to be flexible and ensure continuity in operations.
This hybrid solution can be ideal for SMEs that lack the required financial and technical knowledge or the maturity or size to establish an own centre.
Another important point of view is that a virtual captive could simplify recruitment and reduce any staff attrition where the company isn’t well known in its geographical area.
Avoiding any cost of infrastructure and operations is also crucial when it comes to working out the cost-benefits.
Let’s map the delivery requirements with the benefits of a Virtual Captive Center.
*Service Delivery
The risks of service providing are treated in a more cooperative way.
*Pricing
Continuous management of several cost elements.
*Image
It is usually under the Image of the Company.
*Human Resource
The Company has a voice in HR management.
*Governance
Lesser governance when compared to a traditional captive but larger than outsourcing